MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411037420 · doi:10.18280/jesa.580416

Optimization of a Hybrid PV-Wind Power System for Enhancing Efficiency and Power Quality Using MATLAB/SIMULINK Simulations

2025· article· en· W4411037420 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mochamad Subchan Mauludin, Moh. Khairudin, Rustam Asnawi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMATLABPower qualityComputer sciencePower (physics)Wind powerQuality (philosophy)Photovoltaic systemAutomotive engineeringEnvironmental scienceControl theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing reliance on renewable energy has driven the development of hybrid photovoltaic (PV) and wind turbine systems.This study aims to model and simulate a hybrid PV-Wind system using MATLAB/SIMULINK to evaluate its performance and efficiency under varying environmental conditions.The developed model includes PV panels, wind turbines, power converters, and an inverter with Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) control.Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed hybrid system can generate stable power output and effectively adapt to solar irradiance and wind speed fluctuations.The system achieved an overall energy efficiency of 88%, with power quality metrics indicating reduced total harmonic distortion to below 5%.Additionally, implementing an LC filter in the inverter enhances power quality, producing a more sinusoidal AC voltage with a THD of 3.5%.This study confirms that optimized PV-Wind systems provide a reliable and sustainable solution for electricity generation and significantly improve power quality and efficiency in various operational scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score0.908

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207