Seasonal Variation in Public Interest in Gout: Longitudinal Infodemiology Study Using Google Trends (2014–2024)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Gout, the most common inflammatory arthritis worldwide, shows clear seasonal variation in flares. Traditional epidemiology provides important insights but often lacks real-time resolution. Digital behavior, such as online search patterns, offers a scalable, timely complement that can capture seasonal trends in disease-related activity. Objective: This study aimed to determine whether public interest in gout, as expressed through Google (Google LLC) search queries, exhibits seasonal variation across countries, US states, and metropolitan areas, and to assess the influence of symptom- and language-specific search terms. We evaluated whether a bimodal (semiannual) seasonal pattern better described certain queries, providing further insight into complex behavioral rhythms. Methods: We retrieved monthly Google Trends data for gout-related queries from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2024, covering 70 countries, all 50 US states, and 36 major cities in the United States and Canada. Queries included generic terms, symptom descriptors, and language-specific translations in 14 languages. We applied cosinor modeling to assess seasonality and calculated the amplitude and phase of fitted sinusoidal curves. Significance was assessed using P values and adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) within and across subgroups, and the Bonferroni method. To explore bimodal patterns, we compared 12- and 6-month harmonics using changes in Akaike and Bayesian information criteria. Results: We found robust seasonal variation in gout-related search interest across multiple geographic and linguistic categories. Statistically significant seasonality (original P<.05) was detected in 41 of 70 countries using English terms, with 36 remaining significant after within-group FDR correction and 39 under pooled FDR; only 7 remained significant after Bonferroni adjustment. Among 20 countries using language-specific queries, 15 showed consistent seasonality across all 3 non-Bonferroni methods, while 2 met the Bonferroni threshold. In the United States, 49 out of 50 states and 33 out of 36 cities demonstrated significant seasonality (Bonferroni-adjusted significance in 9 and 10 units, respectively). For symptom- and treatment-related search terms, 18 of 21 exhibited seasonality under multiple correction methods. Peaks in search volume generally occurred in late spring or early summer in the northern hemisphere, with corresponding seasonal shifts in the southern hemisphere. Bimodal patterns were uncommon but identified for terms such as "obesity" and "swollen big toe," suggesting more complex cyclic interest in certain contexts. Conclusions: Google search activity reflects the seasonal dynamics of gout flares, highlighting infodemiology as a population-scale complement to traditional surveillance. This approach may anticipate care needs, guide digital health strategies, and improve preparedness for seasonal, climate-sensitive conditions, while emphasizing the importance of geographic, climatic, and linguistic context in interpreting trends.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".