MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411043123 · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-23316-9

Effects of extreme air pollution and El Niño Southern Oscillation on insufficient sleep: a cross-sectional study

2025· article· en· W4411043123 on OpenAlexafffund
Haris Majeed, Daniyal Zuberi

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research CouncilSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
KeywordsMedicinePoisson regressionDemographyBiostatisticsCross-sectional studyEpidemiologySleep (system call)Environmental healthPopulationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background While there are many well understood clinical risk factors on sleep patterns, the associations of environmental factors, specifically air pollution on insufficient sleep remains understudied. This study investigates the association between insufficient sleep and particulate matter 2.5 (PM 2.5 ) among adults in the United States. There is also a need to determine whether various El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phases are effect modifiers in this relationship. Method A cross-sectional observational analysis using annual survey data from 3100 United States counties for adult (≥ 18 years) age-adjusted insufficient sleep prevalence from 2017 to 2024. Annual average county-specific PM 2.5 data was categorized into three categories [low (< 5 µg/m 3 ), moderate (5–11 µg/m 3 ), extreme (≥ 11 µg/m 3 )]. The annual average ENSO index was used to determine if the year was either El Niño, La Niña, or neutral. Adjusted associations were conducted using Poisson regression and were stratified by various phases of ENSO. Adjusted associations were reported as rate ratio (RR). Results From 2017 to 2024, the United States annual insufficient sleep is 34% [range min to max: 23–49%]. With respect to low PM 2.5 ; moderate and extreme PM 2.5 levels were associated with an increased risk of insufficient sleep by 1.03 (95% CI 1.02–1.05, P < 0.001) and 1.11 (95% CI 1.09–1.12, P < 0.001), respectively. The interaction between PM 2.5 and ENSO was significant ( P < 0.001) on insufficient sleep. The magnitude in associations between extreme PM 2.5 and insufficient sleep differed by various ENSO phases. Conclusion Long-term (i.e. annual) effects of air pollution can pose a risk on adult sleep. While El Niño and La Niña phases were found to be a significant effect modifier, yet during the neutral phase the risks for extreme PM 2.5 were observed to be the strongest on insufficient sleep. Further investigations are needed to recognize the environmental effects on sleep deprivation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Public Health→Same topicAir Quality and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→