MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Russo-Ukrainian War: Political and Trade Implication for American Neighbourhoods

2025· article· en· W4411044133 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Frans Lavdari, Xhulio Lavdari

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Cuban Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianPoliticsPolitical sciencePolitical economyHistoryLawEconomicsLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Russo-Ukrainian War has had very profound implications on world politics and trade, especially for those countries that, due to their geographical, ideological, or political position, have decided or had to take clear positions. In line with their decades-long relations, Cuba has held a position generally aligned in favour of Russia, while the neighbouring United States is in favour of Ukraine, leading the regional situation in Central and North America to develop on these two fronts. In this directive, Mexico and Canada, historical American allies, show that, despite their support for the Ukrainian cause, the international political and commercial line seems to distance us considerably from the United States with regard to Russian allies in Central America, such as Cuba. Not only that. While Canada shows continuity in political and commercial relations, Mexico seems to gradually distance itself from the alliance with the United States, not only maintaining and improving relations with Cuba but perceiving the historical and ideological alliance with the island as a political counterweight to the US’s role in the area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.389 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Cuban StudiesSame topicEuropean and Russian Geopolitical Military StrategiesFrench-language works237,207