MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411046501 · doi:10.1093/tse/tdaf036

Optimizing the mechanical properties and print accuracy of 3D printed lightweighting continuous fibre reinforced polylactic acid foams

2025· article· en· W4411046501 on OpenAlex
Kui Wang, Xinru Li, Ping Cheng, Donghua Zhao, Yi Xiong, Wei Wen, Yong Peng, S. Ahzi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Safety and Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Hunan Province
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialComposite numberPolylactic acidExpansion ratioFlexural strengthCompression (physics)Specific strengthModulusFiberCompressive strengthLayer (electronics)Polymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Due to the urgent demand for lightweight and high-strength materials in rail transportation, this study proposed foamed polylactic acid (PLA) composites reinforced with continuous basalt fibres using a 3D printing technique to address the limitations posed by foaming-induced strength reduction in foam. Through a combination of parametric calculations, microscopic observations and compression experiments, the effects of printing parameters on the expansion ratio and print accuracy of foamed composite were investigated. It was found that adding fibres to foamed PLA reduced the expansion ratio of PLA by up to 9.52% at lower printing temperatures and layer heights but increased it at higher settings. The expansion ratio of the composite significantly increased with high printing temperatures and layer heights. When the composites were fabricated at low print temperatures and high layer heights, noticeable interlayer gaps and exposed fibres leading to poor impregnation were observed at cross-section. This phenomenon was improved as the expansion ratio increased. In addition, specimens with optimal print accuracy were prepared at specific combinations of printing temperature and layer height. In light of this discovery, a predictive function based on combined printing parameters was established to design composites with excellent print accuracy and specific densities. Finally, compression test results showed that with the same density of 0.5 g/cm3, the foamed composite exhibited substantial improvements in compressive strength, modulus and strain energy density compared to the foamed PLA, with increases of 44.44%, 57.02% and 24.19%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it