MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411049468 · doi:10.1093/ijtj/ijaf013

Transformative Memory: Ways of Being Together in the Afterlives of Political Violence

2025· article· en· W4411049468 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Transitional Justice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMiddle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTransformative learningPoliticsSociologyPolitical scienceCriminologyEpistemologyPhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT As a global collective of artists, activists and scholars, the Transformative Memory International Network explores memory as a transformative force attentive to the complexities of power and justice regimes, and to the tensions, exclusions and silences that enter the historical record and institutionally curated representations of political violence. We embrace methodologies of relational, embodied and emplaced knowledge exchanges and foster spaces of creativity such as artistic, affective and experimental approaches to knowledge generation. Reflecting on the memory labours of and knowledge exchanges between members, we interrogate how these works activate transformative possibilities. As a force, memory is a living and persistent insistence of life where life is denied. As a forcefield, memory is a way of persevering, regathering and refashioning a sense of self, relationships to others and political action, anticipating other ways of being together.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it