MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411053834 · doi:10.1130/b38215.1

Detrital zircon signatures of the southern Brooks Range: Implications for the Paleozoic assembly of Arctic Alaska and the Mesozoic opening of the Amerasia Basin

2025· article· en· W4411053834 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jason Craig, Elizabeth L. Miller, John M. Cottle, Andrew Kylander‐Clark

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society of America Bulletin · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyZirconPaleozoicMesozoicArcticStructural basinPaleontologyRange (aeronautics)The arcticBasin and range topographyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Models for the assembly of the Arctic Alaska–Chukotka microplate suggest the juxtaposition of Laurentia- and Baltica-affinity terranes in the mid-Paleozoic. Subsequently, the Arctic Alaska–Chukotka microplate moved southward during the Mesozoic opening of the Amerasia Basin, approaching its present position. To refine these models, this study presents data on the provenance of rocks from the metamorphic core of the southern Brooks Range, elucidating the location of the Arctic Alaska–Chukotka microplate and its composite pre-Mississippian terranes during periods of Arctic tectonic reorganization. The recycling of Tonian–Ediacaran sedimentary and igneous rocks from the southern Arctic Alaska–Chukotka terrane and Arctic Russia across an Ediacaran to Cambrian unconformity, which developed after the Timanian orogeny, restores the southern Arctic Alaska–Chukotka terrane to the northern margin of Baltica during the Precambrian–Cambrian. A pre–Middle Devonian unconformity across Arctic Alaska is recorded in rift-related Middle Devonian to Mississippian(?) sediments. Erosion of genetically unrelated pre–Middle Devonian basement units and mixing of their detritus into localized Middle Devonian and younger rift basins confirm the presence of a major Paleozoic suture in the Arctic Alaska–Chukotka microplate, related to the Caledonain-aged deformation, that juxtaposed Laurentian, Baltican, and isolated intra-Iapetan magmatic arc–affinity terranes. Similar age spectra in Late Devonian sedimentary rocks from Arctic Alaska and Arctic Canada support models proposing that the Arctic Alaska segment of the Arctic Alaska–Chukotka microplate restores to the northern margin of Laurentia prior to the opening of the Amerasia Basin. The contact of pre-Mississippian terranes in Arctic Alaska supports a two-part opening model for the Amerasia Basin, restoring Arctic Alaska to an along-strike position with a correlative suture exposed in northernmost Ellesmere Island, Canada, by a rotational component linked to the opening of the Canada Basin together with a phase of opening perpendicular to the Lomonosov Ridge to restore the Chukotka portion of the Arctic Alaska–Chukotka microplate to the Lomonosov Ridge and northern margin of Baltica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society of America BulletinSame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207