MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411055134 · doi:10.1109/miot.2025.3569146

StrawberryTalk-v2: Edged-IoT System for Detection of Strawberry Anthracnose

2025· article· en· W4411055134 on OpenAlexaff
Chun‐You Liu, Yi‐Bing Lin, M. Wang, Yun-Wei Lin, Wenliang Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Magazine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet of ThingsComputer scienceEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anthracnose diseases can severely affect strawberry plant stands and yields, making early detection essential. Manual identification of diseased plants is labor-intensive, prompting the development of IoT-based AI (AIoT) solutions for more efficient detection. While many AIoT methods rely on high-performance servers typically hosted in the cloud, edge solutions are preferable for commercial farms to reduce dependency on network connections. To implement an effective edge-based system, the computation hardware must feature a capable CPU for running the IoT engine and a GPU sufficient for YOLO-based detection, while maintaining code security. This article explores the StrawberryTalk-v2 solution using the NVIDIA Jetson Nano, secured with Winbond’s W77Q TRUSTME® Secure Serial Flash Memory, fulfilling these requirements. The deployment of the StrawberryTalk-v2 IoT solution on this hardware facilitates strawberry anthracnose detection. Choosing a YOLO version that balances edge device efficiency and high detection accuracy presents a significant challenge. While YOLO11 Nano’s computational complexity is well-suited for edge deployment, its baseline accuracy falls short of YOLO11 Extra Large. By incorporating WIoU and DySample into YOLO11 Nano, the detection accuracy exceeds that of the Extra Large version while retaining the Nano version’s low execution cost. These enhancements allow the system to achieve superior performance, with StrawberryTalk-v2 reaching a four-level detection accuracy of 95.5%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things MagazineSame topicSmart Agriculture and AIFrench-language works237,207