Epigenetic responses in Borrelia-infected Ixodes scapularis ticks: Over-expression of euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 2 and no change in DNA methylation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Borrelia burgdorferi, a tick-vectored spirochete bacteria best known for causing Lyme disease, has been found to induce physiological and behavioural changes in its tick vector that can increase tick fitness and its ability to transmit the bacteria. The mechanism by which this bacterium modulates these changes remains unknown. Epigenetics plays a central role in transducing external and internal microbiome environmental influences to the organism, so we investigated DNA methylation and the expression of a key histone modification enzyme in Borrelia-infected and uninfected Ixodes scapularis ticks. DNA methylation of the pericentromeric tandem repeats family, Ixodes scapularis Repeats (ISR), were assessed by methylated-DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) followed by qPCR of the ISR regions. DNA methylation of the ISR sequences was found. The different repeats had different levels of DNA methylation, however, these levels were not significantly affected by the presence or absence of B. burgdorferi. The epigenetic regulator euchromatic histone lysine methyltransferase 2 (EHMT2) is recognized as having a key role in modulating the organismal stress response to infections. To assess EHMT2 transcription in Borrelia-infected and uninfected ticks, real-time reverse transcriptase PCR was performed. Uninfected ticks had over 800X lower EHMT2 expression than infected ticks. This study is among the first to identify a gene that may be involved in producing epigenetic differences in ticks depending on infection status and lays the groundwork for future epigenetic studies of I. scapularis in response to B. burgdorferi as well as other pathogens that these ticks transmit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".