MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411055426 · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2025.3565622

Adaptive Secure Finite-Time Optimal Control of Unknown Nonlinear Systems With State Constraints via Generalized Fuzzy Hyperbolic Models

2025· article· en· W4411055426 on OpenAlexaff
Hanguang Su, Yi Cui, Huaguang Zhang, Xiangpeng Xie, Xiaodong Liang, Jiawei Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicDifferential Equations and Boundary Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNatural Science Foundation of Liaoning ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsNonlinear systemControl theory (sociology)State (computer science)MathematicsAdaptive controlFuzzy logicFuzzy control systemControl (management)Computer scienceApplied mathematicsMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, a novel adaptive critic learning (ACL) framework is constructed for a class of nonzero-sum (NZS) differential games problem of unknown continuous-time (CT) nonlinear systems with state constraints. First, generalized fuzzy hyperbolic model (GFHM)-based identifiers are established to reconstruct the unknown system dynamics. Then, under the ACL framework, a critic network with secure finite-time experience replay turning law is developed for each player to acquire the Nash equilibrium point solution in finite time while the finite-time stability is guaranteed via Lyapunov analysis. Meanwhile, the persistence of excitation (PE) condition is no longer needed in this work, by introducing an easy-to-check rank condition. Furthermore, by incorporating the immediate cost function associated with each player and the control barrier function (CBF), the algorithm ensures that the system states evolve in a secure environment. Finally, two numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the validity of the developed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning SystemsSame topicDifferential Equations and Boundary ProblemsFrench-language works237,207