MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411059592 · doi:10.1145/3712593

Tensor-empowered Incomplete Multimodal Learning with Modality Reconstruction for Edge Intelligence

2025· article· en· W4411059592 on OpenAlexaff
Xin Nie, Laurence T. Yang, Zhe Li, Fulan Fan, Zecan Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicTensor decomposition and applications
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceModality (human–computer interaction)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionArtificial intelligenceTensor (intrinsic definition)Computer visionHuman–computer interactionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The distributed computing paradigm of edge computing effectively addresses the challenges of data transmission delay and data privacy security. With the increasing popularity of IoT devices and 5 G networks, edge computing has a broader range of applications. The advancement in AI technology enables the realization of edge intelligence, which conducts data processing and analysis on edge devices to avoid excessive data transmission to the cloud, enhance system response speed, and protect user data privacy. In various edge intelligent systems like smart homes and autonomous driving, multimodal data plays a crucial role. However, missing modalities in such systems may lead to model failure in real-world environments. To tackle this issue, we propose a tensor-empowered modality reconstruction network (TMRN) that utilizes an end-to-end variational autoencoder for reconstructing missing modal data. This approach effectively enhances model robustness while reducing model size and training complexity. Furthermore, we introduce a supervised method for feature reconstruction to better align with the true distribution of missing modal data by leveraging tensor feature fusion and label supervision techniques. Additionally, we design a task information disentanglement module to make multimodal representations more relevant to specific tasks by effectively separating task-relevant from task-irrelevant information. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TMRN achieves competitive performance compared to existing state-of-the-art methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and ApplicationsSame topicTensor decomposition and applicationsFrench-language works237,207