Tensor-empowered Incomplete Multimodal Learning with Modality Reconstruction for Edge Intelligence
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The distributed computing paradigm of edge computing effectively addresses the challenges of data transmission delay and data privacy security. With the increasing popularity of IoT devices and 5 G networks, edge computing has a broader range of applications. The advancement in AI technology enables the realization of edge intelligence, which conducts data processing and analysis on edge devices to avoid excessive data transmission to the cloud, enhance system response speed, and protect user data privacy. In various edge intelligent systems like smart homes and autonomous driving, multimodal data plays a crucial role. However, missing modalities in such systems may lead to model failure in real-world environments. To tackle this issue, we propose a tensor-empowered modality reconstruction network (TMRN) that utilizes an end-to-end variational autoencoder for reconstructing missing modal data. This approach effectively enhances model robustness while reducing model size and training complexity. Furthermore, we introduce a supervised method for feature reconstruction to better align with the true distribution of missing modal data by leveraging tensor feature fusion and label supervision techniques. Additionally, we design a task information disentanglement module to make multimodal representations more relevant to specific tasks by effectively separating task-relevant from task-irrelevant information. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TMRN achieves competitive performance compared to existing state-of-the-art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it