MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preface

2025· article· en· W4411065095 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy Security and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

15-18 December 2024 Bangkok, Thailand Conference Website: https://www.isegt.org SEGT 2024 The International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Green Technology 2024 (SEGT 2024) was held in Bangkok, Thailand, from December 15-18, 2024, with the theme “ Sustaining the Future with Green Energy and Clean Environmental Technology ”. SEGT 2024 was co-organized by Chulalongkorn University, Universiti Malaya, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, National Taipei University of Technology, and University of the Philippines Diliman, with additional support from other contributing institutions such as National Cheng Kung University, Tsinghua University, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, De La Salle University, National Dong Hwa University, The University of Hong Kong, City University of Hong Kong, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Sichuan Fine Arts Institute, and the International Association for Hydrogen Energy. SEGT 2024 welcomed more than 350 participants from 20 countries, regions, and economies worldwide, including Malaysia, Thailand, Canada, China, the Philippines, Taiwan, Singapore, Indonesia, Hong Kong SAR, Japan, India, Vietnam, South Korea, New Zealand, Australia, the UK, Turkey, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia, etc. The conference served as a platform for researchers, academics, and industry professionals to exchange knowledge, present groundbreaking research, and explore innovative solutions in sustainable energy and green technology. The list of Committee of SEGT 2024 is available in this PDF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceSame topicGlobal Energy Security and PolicyFrench-language works237,207