Integrating blockchain technology for secure access control in smart home environments: A comprehensive review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Smart home technologies have revolutionized modern living by enhancing convenience, efficiency, and security. In contrast, many interconnected devices introduce significant security and privacy challenges. This comprehensive review investigates the integration of blockchain technology as a robust solution for secure access control in smart home environments. The decentralized and tamper-resistant nature of blockchain technology effectively solves important problems, including device authentication, data integrity, and access management, through the use of cryptography and distributed ledgers. The study synthesizes findings from 52 research papers, categorizing them into three thematic areas: blockchain in access control systems, its applications in IoT, and specific implementations for smart homes. It highlights the transformative potential of blockchain in mitigating vulnerabilities inherent in centralized systems, fostering trust, and enhancing security frameworks. Despite its promising applications, challenges such as scalability, interoperability, and energy consumption persist, warranting further research. This paper stresses the necessity of collaboration to tackle these limitations and enhance blockchain-based access control solutions for smart homes, setting the stage for more secure and user-focused smart environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".