MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411069655 · doi:10.5267/j.ijdns.2025.6.002

Enhancing privacy in clustering and data mining: A novel approach for sensitive data protection

2025· article· en· W4411069655 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Haythem Hayouni

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Data and Network Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisData Protection Act 1998Computer scienceInformation privacyPrivacy protectionData miningInternet privacyComputer securityData scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the era of big data, clustering and data mining have become essential tools for uncovering patterns and insights from vast datasets. However, these processes often involve the use of sensitive data, raising significant concerns about privacy, security, and trustworthiness. This paper proposes N2P-CM, a novel privacy-preserving framework designed to protect sensitive information during the entire clustering and mining lifecycle. Unlike existing methods that focus on partial aspects of security or apply generic encryption techniques, N2P-CM integrates five innovative and synergistic modules: Sensitive Feature Obfuscation, Adaptive Trust Weight Aggregation, Compressed Secure Semantic Embedding, Differential Traceable Execution Engine, and Blockchain Auditable Ledger. Each module contributes a distinct layer of privacy and accountability, ranging from feature-level data transformation and federated trust scoring to secure semantic encoding and traceable execution logging with blockchain support. We provide formal definitions and algorithms for each module and demonstrate their integration in a unified architecture. Extensive simulations using real-world datasets validate the efficacy of N2P-CM, showing that it achieves strong privacy guarantees with minimal degradation in clustering accuracy. This research contributes a comprehensive and modular solution to the growing need for privacy-preserving analytics in sensitive domains such as healthcare, finance, and smart cities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.009
Open science0.0040.009
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Data and Network ScienceSame topicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataFrench-language works237,207