MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411074576 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-vfmgs

Transforming Aluminium Waste: Sustainable Conversion to Commercial MOFs, Hydrogen Fuel, and Essential Aluminium Feedstocks

2025· preprint· en· W4411074576 on OpenAlexafffund
Mason C. Lawrence, R.W. Horne, Barry A. Blight

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBauxite Residue and Utilization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNew Brunswick Innovation FoundationImpact Fund
KeywordsAluminiumWaste managementMaterials scienceHydrogenHydrogen fuelEnvironmental scienceMetallurgyChemistryEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aluminium dross waste is generated during the aluminium smelting process and has an annual production of nearly 5.3M tonnes worldwide. It is largely comprised of aluminium but also contains different metal oxides, silicates, and other impurities. We demonstrate how to make use of dross by producing high-value products (hydrogen gas, aluminium formate, aluminium acetate, aluminium hydroxide, MOF-303, Al-Fum) towards decarbonization of the aluminium industry. We produce hydrogen gas (1.1-1.2 Lg-1 of dross) by digesting it with NaOH, while further outlining methods to upcycle this encased aluminium into high value materials, and identify a route to pure amporhous Al2O3 via aluminium formate or aluminium acetate. We also demonstrate the production of the water harvesing MOF-303 and Al-Fum directly from processed dross as the aluminium source. This study highlights a complete overview of upcycling of aluminium dross to high value products towards a green energy shift, and industrial circircular economy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicBauxite Residue and UtilizationFrench-language works237,207