MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411080144 · doi:10.1007/s12519-026-01027-4

Validation of the youth version of the Alimetry® Gut-Brain Wellbeing Survey: A mental health scale for young people with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms

2025· preprint· en· W4411080144 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Pediatrics · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersHealth Research Council of New ZealandUniversity of Auckland
KeywordsMental healthScale (ratio)PsychologyPsychiatryGastroduodenal ulcerClinical psychologyMedicineGastroenterologyGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Chronic gastroduodenal symptoms present significant challenges for young people, often negatively impacting their quality of life and mental health. However, there is currently a lack of validated tools to assess mental health in young people with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms. This research outlines the development and validation of the Alimetry® Gut-Brain Wellbeing Survey-Youth Version (AGBW-Y), a novel tool for assessing mental health in young people with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms aged 12-17 years. Methods An iterative multi-phase approach was employed. In Phase 1, feedback was gathered from 19 paediatric clinicians in the gastroenterology field and 33 young people over multiple rounds to adapt the adult version of the AGBW Survey to be age-appropriate for young people aged 12-17 years. In Phase 2, rigorous psychometric testing of the adapted scale was conducted in a sample of 128 patients aged 12-17 years with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms, using an anonymous online survey. Results Based on the feedback from Phase 1, an interdisciplinary team of experts improved the survey’s language and usability for young people, including the removal of reverse-coded items. These adjustments enhanced the scale’s clarity, acceptability, and face and content validity. The final AGBW-Y comprises a patient preface, an opt-out option, 10 closed-ended questions, and an optional open-ended question. It assesses general mental health, alongside subscales of depression, stress, and anxiety. Phase 2 demonstrated excellent psychometric properties of the scale, including high internal consistency (α= .91 for the total scale; α= .75-.85 for subscales) and strong convergent, divergent, and concurrent validity with large effect sizes. Conclusions The AGBW-Y is a brief, reliable, and valid tool to assess mental health in young people with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms. This novel scale was developed through a rigorous co-design process with clinicians and young people, ensuring it is contextually relevant and clinically impactful. The AGBW-Y complements existing physiological assessments, enabling more accurate mental health evaluations which can be used to guide psychological referrals, support multidisciplinary care, and evaluate treatment outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it