MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411088428 · doi:10.5206/mt.v5i2.22175

Algorithm for finding reduction transformation that transforms a rational ODE to solvable structure

2025· article· en· W4411088428 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMaple Transactions · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Technology and Methodologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOdeReduction (mathematics)Transformation (genetics)MathematicsPure mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldApplied mathematicsMathematical economicsComputer scienceMathematical optimizationGeometryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integrability problem of rational first order ODE y'=M(x,y)/N(x,y), M,N in R[x,y], which can be viewed as a planar vector field, has been a long term research interest in area of dynamical system, physics etc. Since the invention of the computer algebra system, many algorithms have been developed to find the explicit first integral of such ODE and Maple has the most advanced function, called dsolve to handle this problem. In this paper, we would like to introduce an efficient algorithm which can be viewed as a supplement of the existing dsolve command, to judge whether a given rational ODE is of "reducible" structure, that is, via a rational, non-linear algebraic transformation in terms of the variable y, the ODE can be reduced to a more simple structure y'=Σni=0 fi(x)yi. Many of the known solvable ODE, including Bernoulli, Riccati, Abel, Chini are of this structure, and the integrable type of such ODE can be classified using invariants under linear transformation. We have implemented this algorithm based on Maple. And the overall performance and efficiency of this algorithm is considerable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaple TransactionsSame topicEngineering Technology and MethodologiesFrench-language works237,207