MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411091250 · doi:10.1103/physrevx.15.021085

Phase Diagram of Extensive-Rank Symmetric Matrix Denoising beyond Rotational Invariance

2025· article· en· W4411091250 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review X · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Polarization and Ellipsometry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersCore Research for Evolutional Science and TechnologyJapan Science and Technology AgencyEuropean CommissionNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaH2020 European Research CouncilCanada Research ChairsJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
KeywordsRotational invarianceRank (graph theory)Matrix (chemical analysis)Phase diagramStatistical physicsRotation (mathematics)Theoretical physicsPhysicsMathematicsPhase (matter)Materials scienceQuantum mechanicsCombinatoricsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Matrix denoising is central to signal processing and machine learning. Its statistical analysis when the matrix to infer has a factorized structure with a rank growing proportionally to its dimension remains a challenge, except when it is rotationally invariant. In this case, the information-theoretic limits and an efficient Bayes-optimal denoising algorithm, called the rotational invariant estimator, are known. Beyond this setting, few results can be found. The reason is that the model is not a usual spin system because of the growing rank dimension, nor a matrix model (as appearing in high-energy physics) due to the lack of rotation symmetry, but rather a hybrid between the two. In this paper, we make progress toward the understanding of Bayesian matrix denoising when the hidden signal is a factored matrix <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mrow> <a:mrow> <a:mi mathvariant="bold">X</a:mi> </a:mrow> <a:msup> <a:mrow> <a:mi mathvariant="bold">X</a:mi> </a:mrow> <a:mrow> <a:mo>⊺</a:mo> </a:mrow> </a:msup> </a:mrow> </a:math> that is not rotationally invariant. Monte Carlo simulations suggest the existence of a denoising-factorization transition separating a phase where denoising using the rotational-invariant estimator remains Bayes-optimal due to universality properties of the same nature as in random matrix theory, from one where universality breaks down and better denoising is possible, though algorithmically hard. We also argue that it is only beyond the transition that factorization, i.e., estimating <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <e:mrow> <e:mi mathvariant="bold">X</e:mi> </e:mrow> </e:math> itself, becomes possible up to irresolvable ambiguities. On the theoretical side, we combine mean-field techniques in an interpretable multiscale fashion in order to access the minimum mean-square error and mutual information. Interestingly, our alternative method yields equations reproducible by the replica approach of Sakata and Kabashima. Using numerical insights, we delimit the portion of phase diagram where we conjecture the mean-field theory to be exact and correct it using universality when it is not. Our complete matches well the numerics in the whole phase diagram when considering finite-size effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it