MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411092134 · doi:10.1029/2024ea003876

The Fast Borealis Ionosphere: High Time‐Resolution Mapping of Polar Ionospheric Flows With SuperDARN

2025· article· en· W4411092134 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Daniel Billett, Remington Rohel, C. J. Martin, K. A. McWilliams, K. M. Laundal

Bibliographic record

VenueEarth and Space Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNorges Forskningsråd
KeywordsIonospherePolarGeologyHigh resolutionGeophysicsGeodesyRemote sensingPhysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recent improvements to hardware for the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network systems have allowed for a much greater control of radar transmit and receive functionalities than previously possible. One of these functionalities is the application of a new operational mode, known as wide‐beam, which vastly improves the temporal resolution of the radars without compromising their spatial coverage. Wide‐beam allows for the retrieval of line‐of‐sight ionospheric drift velocities at a temporal resolution of 3.7 s, a sixteen‐fold improvement from the one‐minute resolution offered by traditional operational modes. In this paper, we use wide‐beam data from the Borealis SuperDARN systems, located in Canada, to derive local horizontal ionospheric plasma velocity fields above Northern Canada, Greenland, and the polar cap, at a 3.7 s temporal resolution. For this local fitting of ionospheric velocity data, we use the Local Mapping of Ionospheric Electrodynamics (Lompe) spherical elementary current systems technique. This new data product, which we call the Fast Borealis Ionosphere, is compared to both the global SuperDARN spherical harmonic convection pattern data product (the Map Potential technique), as well as Lompe convection patterns derived using the traditional SuperDARN narrow‐beam scanning mode. We show that Lompe systematically produces a better representation of the underlying radar velocity data than Map Potential, that the 3.7 s wide‐beam data contains a significant amount more ionospheric variability than narrow‐beam, and that the high time‐resolution convection patterns can resolve dynamic ionospheric events lasting on the order of tens of seconds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.549
Threshold uncertainty score0.528

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarth and Space ScienceSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207