Empowering SDN with DDoS attack detection: leveraging hybrid machine learning based IDPS controller for robust security
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>Software-defined network (SDN) is an innovative networking framework where a centralized controller manages networking administration and sorts out network traffic issues. It becomes difficult for the controller to identify the malicious user who is sending a large number of spoofed packets, such as in a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack. To prevent DDoS attacks from damaging legitimate users, it is important to take steps to prevent them. The issue of preventing DDoS attacks in SDN remains unresolved despite many algorithms proposed. Methods presented in this paper employ bandwidth threshold estimation, which triggers the intrusion detection and prevention system (IDPS) controller if the threshold is exceeded. Whenever the threshold is exceeded due to network congestion, transferred packets are filtered at the server level by identifying the utilization of bandwidth in OpenDaylight (ODL) and POX. K-nearest neighbor (K-NN) and support vector machine (SVM) are used by the IDPS controller to detect and thwart DDoS attacks. Using Mininet, two SDN centralized controllers are simulated to improve performance significantly. Based on SVM in the ODL controller, this work has provided mitigation techniques for preventing DDoS attacks with an accuracy of 96.75% compared to previously published accuracy.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it