Divergent Plastid Genomes in the Deepest-Branching Apicomplexan Parasites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Apicomplexans are widespread and diverse obligate symbionts of animals, and many-like the malaria-causing Plasmodium-are important human parasites. Some of the closest free-living relatives of apicomplexans are photosynthetic, and most apicomplexans retain a relict, nonphotosynthetic plastid called the apicoplast. The origin and evolution of this plastid has been studied extensively, but most data come from biomedically relevant taxa. There has been increasing interest in the diversity of plastids of other apicomplexans, which has revealed a complex picture of recurring, independent losses of plastids or their genomes in the deepest-branching apicomplexan lineages, Cryptosporidium and the gregarines. Indeed, the plastid is absent from many of these deep-branching apicomplexans, and those that retain it have almost all lost its genome. The single exception appears to be the archigregarines, the deepest-branching subgroup of gregarines, which are suspected to have retained a genome based on analyses of nuclear genes, but for which no plastid genome data are known. As the best potential representatives of plastid genomes in deep-branching apicomplexans, this lineage is an obvious missing piece of the evolutionary puzzle of the apicoplast. Here, we used single-cell sequencing to characterize the plastid genome from uncultivated representatives of all 4 known archigregarine lineages. The plastid genomes are all more divergent with lower GC-content than other apicoplast genomes, and encode a slightly different set of genes. There is no evidence of photosynthesis-related genes. These genomes fill a key gap in the diversity of apicomplexan plastid genomes, furthering our understanding of the complex evolution of the apicoplast.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".