MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411100351 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2025-2061

Retrieval of Aerosol Properties from Direct Solar Irradiance Measurements with High Temporal Resolution and Spectral Range

2025· preprint· en· W4411100351 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Angelos Karanikolas, Benjamín Torres, Masahiro Momoi, Marcos Herreras-Giralda, Natalia Kouremeti, Jülian Gröbner, Lionel Doppler, Stelios Kazadzis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSolar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Metrology Programme for Innovation and ResearchEuropean Cooperation in Science and Technology
KeywordsIrradianceAerosolRange (aeronautics)Remote sensingEnvironmental scienceSolar irradianceAtmospheric sciencesMaterials scienceOpticsMeteorologyPhysicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Several sun photometer networks worldwide include instruments for aerosol optical depth (AOD) observations, such as Global Atmospheric Atmosphere Watch-Precision Filter Radiometer (GAW-PFR) and Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET). AERONET provides additional aerosol properties such as the detailed volume size distribution and the single scattering albedo through inversion modelling of sky radiance measurements. However, the data availability for such properties is limited due to the limited number of daily almucantar sky radiance scans and cloudiness. AOD measurements are significantly more frequent as they can be even every minute and are affected only by clouds being too close or covering the solar disk. The Generalized Retrieval of Atmosphere and Surface Properties (GRASP) is a flexible inversion model to retrieve aerosol properties from various observations. One of its capabilities is the retrieval of the volume concentration, the volume median radius and geometric standard deviation for each aerosol size distribution mode and the separation of AOD to each mode using only spectral AOD as an input parameter. Such properties are important for various applications, as the size of aerosols affects their interaction with solar radiation, clouds and radiative forcing modelling. Size also shows significant differences depending on the aerosol type such as dust or biomass burning. In this study, we selected four common stations of GAW-PFR and AERONET and used GRASP to retrieve the bimodal size distribution parameters from AOD measured by GAW-PFR instruments (PFRs). We assessed the homogeneity with the AERONET output parameters and investigated the effect of the spectral range and on such retrievals. We also assessed the performance for certain dust and biomass burning cases. Our results showed good agreement between PFR AOD-based and AERONET sky radiance inversions for AOD modal separation and volume concentrations. Significant improvement of the PFR-AERONET intercomparison was also possible for the fine mode volume and effective radius when restricting the datasets to AOD at 500 nm > 0.1 and Angström Exponent (AE) >1. Also, the results showed consistency with previous study regarding the validation of such retrievals using AERONET AOD. Focusing on conditions with high proportion of dust particles, we found consistent results with the general cases. Using AOD with a larger spectral range (from BTS spectroradiometer), we found that the wavelength selection may affect the results and that using longer wavelengths can increase the sensitivity of coarse mode volume median radius to AOD and improve the correlation of the GRASP BTS AOD-based and AERONET datasets. However, the available data were limited, so it is not clear under what conditions the inclusion of such wavelengths will result in more accurate retrievals. Finally, we were able to reproduce with GRASP the aerosol size characteristics of unusual biomass burning cases from the Canadian wildfires during 2023, but the results showed systematically increased fine mode radius and concentration compared to the AERONET output.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSolar Radiation and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207