A hybrid Bi-LSTM model for data-driven maintenance planning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modern industries dependent on reliable asset operation under constrained resources employ intelligent maintenance methods to maximize efficiency. However, classical maintenance methods rely on assumed lifetime distributions and suffer from estimation errors and computational complexity. The advent of Industry 4.0 has increased the use of sensors for monitoring systems, while deep learning (DL) models have allowed for accurate system health predictions, enabling data-driven maintenance planning. Most intelligent maintenance literature has used DL models solely for remaining useful life (RUL) point predictions, and a substantial gap exists in further using predictions to inform maintenance plan optimization. The few existing studies that have attempted to bridge this gap suffer from having used simple system configurations and non-scalable models. Hence, this paper develops a hybrid DL model using Monte Carlo dropout to generate RUL predictions which are used to construct empirical system reliability functions used for the optimization of the selective maintenance problem (SMP). The proposed framework is used to plan maintenance for a mission-oriented series k-out-of-n:G system. Numerical experiments compare the framework's performance against prior SMP methods and highlight its strengths. When minimizing cost, maintenance plans are frequently produced that result in mission survival while avoiding unnecessary repairs. The proposed method is usable in large-scale, complex scenarios and various industrial contexts. The method finds exact solutions while avoiding the need for computationally-intensive parametric reliability functions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it