MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411109640 · doi:10.3389/fendo.2025.1568981

Bone biomarkers in post-polio clinic patients

2025· article· en· W4411109640 on OpenAlexafffund
Seyed Pezhman Madani, Richard Kremer, Ami Grunbaum, Shaddam Bagmar, Andrea Benedetti, Daria A. Trojan

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Endocrinology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral Infections and Immunology Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health CentreRoyal Victoria HospitalMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
KeywordsMedicinePoliomyelitisBioinformaticsInternal medicineVirologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Osteoporosis is common in post-polio clinic patients, and is reported in 30%to 50% of middle-aged individuals with previous polio. The levels of bone biomarkers (calcium regulating hormones, bone metabolism markers, and bone turnover markers), and the response of bone turnover markers to bisphosphonates is unknown in post-polio patients with osteoporosis. Objectives: 1) To describe serum levels of bone biomarkers in post-polio clinic patients with osteoporosis and compare these levels to those in controls with osteoporosis without neurological disease. 2) To examine the change in serum levels of bone biomarkers in post-polio patients following at least six months of treatment with bisphosphonates and compare these changes to controls. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of Post-Polio and Bone Metabolism Clinic charts of our center. Patients without osteoporosis, and incomplete lab data were excluded. For the second objective, patients untreated with bisphosphonates were excluded. Results: Mean age and proportion of females were similar in post-polio patients (n=25) and controls (n=31) (66.3 ± 8.1 vs 66.2 ± 10.9 years, 52% vs 61%). Mean baseline serum levels of calcium, calcium regulating hormones [parathyroid hormone (PTH), 25-hydroxy Vitamin D), and serum bone turnover makers (sBTM's; osteocalcin, C-telopeptide, non-specific alkaline phosphatase (ALP)] were normal. PTH (4.4 ± 1.7 vs 5.5 ± 2.3 pmol/L, p=0.05), ALP (63.9 ± 15.8 vs 76.2 ± 26.7 U/L, p=0.04), osteocalcin (18.3 ± 8.8 vs 26.9 ± 8.4 ng/ml, p<0.01), and C-telopeptide (0.35 ± 0.2 vs 0.55 ± 0.21 microgram/L, p=0.01) were significantly lower in post-polio patients. After ≥ six months of treatment with bisphosphonates, sBTM's declined significantly in both groups, with a significantly greater reduction in controls for osteocalcin (p<0.01) and C-telopeptide (p=0.02). Conclusions: While mean levels of all evaluated bone biomarkers were normal, PTH and sBTMs were significantly lower in post-polio patients with osteoporosis compared to controls, indicating reduced bone turnover. With bisphosphonate treatment, osteocalcin and C-telopeptide declined significantly in both groups, but significantly more in controls than in post-polio patients. These results indicate that BTM's could be useful for monitoring treatment response in post-polio patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in EndocrinologySame topicViral Infections and Immunology ResearchFrench-language works237,207