MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411110576 · doi:10.1163/22138617-12340340

Defamiliarizing the Familiar? Two Reflections on the Longevity of Ṣādeq Hedāyat’s Fiction

2025· article· en· W4411110576 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOriente Moderno · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and History
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLongevityMedicineGerontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Although Ṣādeq Hedāyat’s works were first published in Iran more than eighty years ago, he remains one of the much-discussed and analyzed modern Iranian authors, both in Iran and abroad. The premise of this article is that the continuing fascination with Hedāyat and the intense focus on his most enigmatic works is partially due to his ability to cast well-established Persian cultural paradigms in novel, unfamiliar moulds. That preconception is tested in two ways: First, by examining trends in the literary discourse about Hedāyat (in Persian, in Iran; and English-language academic publications in the West); and secondly, through textual analysis of a short story, which demonstrates his ability to “defamiliarize the familiar”, thus using traditional templates to modern ends.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it