The Potential of DPSIR Framework to Develop a Holistic Picture of Arctic Industries and Livelihood—A Scoping Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Arctic and its resources are becoming a hotspot of increasing political, environmental, and social conflict. The Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework can be a useful tool when trying to disentangle the complex issues affecting the region and organize their fundamental components along a causal chain, thus promoting a much-needed integration between social and environmental sciences on one hand and science and policy making on the other (especially when a participatory approach is pursued). The aim of this article is to facilitate and improve future applications of the DPSIR framework in the Arctic context. This is pursued through a comprehensive literature review of the use of the DPSIR framework in the Arctic, with a focus on five of the most important economic sectors in the Arctic economy: aquaculture and fisheries, mining, forestry, tourism, and Indigenous livelihoods. In order to promote the most accurate and balanced approach to the DPSIR framework, its main criticisms and variants are also discussed. The article provides a summary of indicators used in Arctic case studies and focuses on the relevance of the framework as a tool for both local stakeholder involvement and participative policy-making processes. It also provides a general model for application of the DPSIR framework in the Arctic context and, when Arctic examples are not available, a summary of relevant examples outside the Arctic area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".