MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411115325 · doi:10.1101/2025.06.06.658331

Multimodal profiling unveils a reversible breast basal-like cell state in AKT-inhibitor resistant tumours

2025· preprint· en· W4411115325 on OpenAlexaff
Colin D.H. Ratcliffe, Hugh Sparks, Giulia L. M. Boezio, Yuriy Alexandrov, Robert P. Jenkins, Alix Le Marois, Pablo Soro-Barrio, Rebecca Lee, Nils Gustafsson, Louis Tully, Morag Park, James I. MacRae, Rachael Natrajan, Andrea Serio, Andrew Riddell, Christopher Dunsby, Erik Sahai

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicClick Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilWellcome Trust
KeywordsProfiling (computer programming)Breast cancerProtein kinase BBasal (medicine)Cancer researchCell biologyComputational biologyBiologyComputer scienceCancerSignal transductionEndocrinologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is central to cell metabolism and growth. However, pharmacological inhibition of the pathway is not uniformly effective across cancer types, or even within a single cancer model. In this study, we leverage oblique plane microscopy of triple negative breast cancer organoids, as well as lineage tracing to uncover a source of heterogeneity. Non-genetic resistance to AKT inhibition is associated with basal cell features of normal breast epithelium and the master transcription factor of basal cell state, ΔNp63α, is sufficient to confer resistance. Cells can transition between states within four weeks and therefore, AKT inhibition only delays tumour growth, with tumours rich in KRT14+ cells resulting. Thus, under selection, triple negative breast cancer exploits a repertoire of cell states inherent to the breast.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicClick Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207