Scalable antimicrobial air filters: polypropylene/rose bengal melt-blown nonwoven filters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the limitations of conventional face masks, which primarily function as aerosol physical filters without inherent antibacterial or antiviral properties. Surgical masks, which depend on electrostatic filtration, lose their efficacy as these charges dissipate within a few hours of use. This study aims to address these shortcomings by developing advanced melt-blown nonwoven filters using polypropylene (PP) and Rose bengal (RB) as a photosensitizer. The impact of varying processing temperatures during the fabrication of melt-blown nonwoven's fiber morphology, filtration efficiency, and antibacterial properties was systematically investigated. The incorporation of RB is intended to enhance antibacterial activity. Results show that processing temperature significantly influences fiber diameter, with optimized filters demonstrating superior antibacterial performance (>99 %), particulate filtration efficiency (PFE) of 63 % compared to conventional masks. These filters with advanced functionality present promising improvements in antimicrobial protection from the ambient environment and durability, contributing to the development of more effective and long-lasting personal protective equipment (PPE).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".