MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411116773 · doi:10.1177/09727531251344712

Cognitive Outcome in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery and Anterior Cerebral Artery Territory Ischaemic Stroke at a Tertiary Health Care Centre

2025· article· en· W4411116773 on OpenAlex
Sumedh S. Agrawal, Nikith Shetty, Arvind Prabhu, Aparna Pai

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Neurosciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentMedicineStroke (engine)CognitionMiddle cerebral arteryRehabilitationPhysical therapyInternal medicineCognitive declinePediatricsCardiologyCognitive impairmentPsychiatryDementiaIschemiaDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Stroke is a major cause of disability and mortality, often leading to both motor and cognitive impairments. Cognitive impairment is common among stroke survivors, with ischaemic strokes constituting the majority. While physical rehabilitation is emphasised, cognitive assessment remains underutilised in acute care. Purpose: This study aimed to assess cognitive impairment in patients with ischaemic stroke affecting the anterior circulation using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale, and to correlate clinical variables with cognitive outcomes. Methods: This observational study was conducted over 18 months at a tertiary healthcare centre in coastal Karnataka, India. Patients with first-ever ischaemic stroke involving the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and anterior cerebral artery (ACA) territories were included. Cognitive impairment was assessed using the MoCA scale within 1 week of stroke onset and again at 90 days. Clinical data such as NIHSS and mRS scores, as well as stroke subtype (via TOAST classification), were also collected. Results: A total of 96 patients were included, with a mean age of 62.5 ± 10.3 years. At baseline, 55% of patients showed cognitive impairment, which improved at the 90-day follow-up (45% impaired). The most frequently affected domains were Attention (55%), Language (45%) and Executive function (50%). Factors such as older age, lower education level and higher NIHSS scores were associated with worse cognitive outcomes. Stroke aetiology (large-artery atherosclerosis and cardioembolism) was linked to more severe cognitive deficits. Aphasia was observed in 29 patients, and follow-up MoCA testing showed minimal cognitive improvement in this group. Conclusion: Vascular cognitive impairment is a significant concern in ischaemic stroke patients. The MoCA scale is an effective tool for the early identification of cognitive impairment, even within the first week post-stroke. Age, education, NIHSS and mRS scores are critical predictors of post-stroke cognitive decline. Further studies are needed to refine cognitive assessment tools, especially for aphasic patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it