Brain tau PET-based identification and characterization of subpopulations in patients with Alzheimer’s disease using deep learning-derived saliency maps
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder in which tau neurofibrillary tangles are a pathological hallmark closely associated with cognitive dysfunction and neurodegeneration. In this study, we used brain tau data to investigate AD heterogeneity by identifying and characterizing the subpopulations among patients. We included 615 cognitively normal and 159 AD brain 18 F-flortaucipr PET scans, along with T1-weighted MRI from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database. A three dimensional-convolutional neural network model was employed for AD detection using standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) images. The model-derived saliency maps were generated and employed as informative image features for clustering AD participants. Among the identified subpopulations, statistical analysis of demographics, neuropsychological measures, and SUVR were compared. Correlations between neuropsychological measures and regional SUVRs were assessed. A generalized linear model was utilized to investigate the sex and APOE ε4 interaction effect on regional SUVRs. Two distinct subpopulations of AD patients were revealed, denoted as S Hi and S Lo . Compared to the S Lo group, the S Hi group exhibited a significantly higher global tau burden in the brain, but both groups showed similar cognition distribution levels. In the S Hi group, the associations between the neuropsychological measurements and regional tau deposition were weakened. Moreover, a significant interaction effect of sex and APOE ε4 on tau deposition was observed in the S Lo group, but no such effect was found in the S Hi group. Our results suggest that tau tangles, as shown by SUVR, continue to accumulate even when cognitive function plateaus in AD patients, highlighting the advantages of PET in later disease stages. The differing relationships between cognition and tau deposition, and between gender, APOE4, and tau deposition, provide potential for subtype-specific treatments. Targeting gender-specific and genetic factors influencing tau deposition, as well as interventions aimed at tau’s impact on cognition, may be effective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".