MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411133650 · doi:10.1186/s40658-025-00761-4

Brain tau PET-based identification and characterization of subpopulations in patients with Alzheimer’s disease using deep learning-derived saliency maps

2025· article· en· W4411133650 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEJNMMI Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthGenentechIXICOH. Lundbeck A/SServierEisaiNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationPfizerNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationUniversity of Southern CaliforniaBiogenEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers SquibbBioClinicaU.S. Department of DefenseAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeMeso Scale DiagnosticsNational Institute on AgingAlzheimer's Association
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Artificial intelligenceDiseasePattern recognition (psychology)Computer sciencePathologyMedicineNuclear medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder in which tau neurofibrillary tangles are a pathological hallmark closely associated with cognitive dysfunction and neurodegeneration. In this study, we used brain tau data to investigate AD heterogeneity by identifying and characterizing the subpopulations among patients. We included 615 cognitively normal and 159 AD brain 18F-flortaucipr PET scans, along with T1-weighted MRI from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database. A three dimensional-convolutional neural network model was employed for AD detection using standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) images. The model-derived saliency maps were generated and employed as informative image features for clustering AD participants. Among the identified subpopulations, statistical analysis of demographics, neuropsychological measures, and SUVR were compared. Correlations between neuropsychological measures and regional SUVRs were assessed. A generalized linear model was utilized to investigate the sex and APOE ε4 interaction effect on regional SUVRs. Two distinct subpopulations of AD patients were revealed, denoted as SHi and SLo. Compared to the SLo group, the SHi group exhibited a significantly higher global tau burden in the brain, but both groups showed similar cognition distribution levels. In the SHi group, the associations between the neuropsychological measurements and regional tau deposition were weakened. Moreover, a significant interaction effect of sex and APOE ε4 on tau deposition was observed in the SLo group, but no such effect was found in the SHi group. Our results suggest that tau tangles, as shown by SUVR, continue to accumulate even when cognitive function plateaus in AD patients, highlighting the advantages of PET in later disease stages. The differing relationships between cognition and tau deposition, and between gender, APOE4, and tau deposition, provide potential for subtype-specific treatments. Targeting gender-specific and genetic factors influencing tau deposition, as well as interventions aimed at tau’s impact on cognition, may be effective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it