L’évaluation-régulation des apprentissages et le geste didactique de régulation de l’enseignement : deux notions reliées à l’échelle d’une séquence sur le récit d’énigme <i>L’Indien de la tour Eiffel</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette recherche étudie l’évaluation-régulation des apprentissages et le geste didactique fondamental de régulation de l’enseignement dans une séquence d’enseignement sur L’Indien de la tour Eiffel. Composée de cinq leçons, elle a été mise en oeuvre dans une classe genevoise de primaire. Pendant les interactions entre l’enseignant et ses élèves, nous interrogeons le geste didactique de régulation et les quatre gestes spécifiques qui le constituent à la lumière de la fonction formative de l’évaluation. Dans nos résultats, nous présentons différentes modalités de ces gestes. Ces modalités comportent certaines opérations enseignantes de régulation nous permettant d’établir des liens théoriques avec l’évaluation-régulation des apprentissages. Celle-ci cherche, entre autres, à soutenir la construction progressive du sens textuel des élèves et s’intègre aux pratiques d’enseignement et d’apprentissage. Par ailleurs et du point de vue situé, les contributions de la classe entretiendraient des relations de coajustement et de codéveloppement avec les régulations étudiées dans la séquence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Observational | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Qualitative | low |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".