MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411135340 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf932

Distinct origins of environmentally quenched galaxies in the core and outer virialized regions of massive clusters at 0.8 &amp;lt; <i>z</i> &amp;lt; 1.5

2025· article· en· W4411135340 on OpenAlexafffund
Guillaume Hewitt, Florian Sarron, Michael L. Balogh, Gregory Rudnick, Yannick M Bahé, Devontae C. Baxter, G. Castignani, Pierluigi Cerulo, Michael C. Cooper, R. Demarco, Adit H Edward, Rose Finn, Ben Forrest, Adam Muzzin, Julie Nantais, Benedetta Vulcani, Gillian Wilson, Dennis Zaritsky

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungUK Research and InnovationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsRedshiftGalaxyVelocity dispersionPopulationStar formationCluster (spacecraft)RADIUSQuenching (fluorescence)Galaxy cluster

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT High-redshift ($z\sim 1$) galaxy clusters are the domain where environmental quenching mechanisms are expected to emerge as important factors in the evolution of the quiescent galaxy population. Uncovering these initially subtle effects requires exploring multiple dependencies of quenching across the cluster environment, and through time. We analyse the stellar mass functions (SMFs) of 17 galaxy clusters within the GOGREEN and GCLASS surveys in the range $0.8< z<1.5$, and with $\log {(M/{\rm {M_\odot }})}>9.5$. The data are fit simultaneously with a Bayesian model that allows the Schechter function parameters of the quiescent and star-forming populations to vary smoothly with cluster-centric radius and redshift. The model also fits the radial galaxy number density profile of each population, allowing the global quenched fraction to be parametrized as a function of redshift and cluster velocity dispersion. We find the star-forming SMF to not depend on radius or redshift. For the quiescent population however, there is $\sim 2\sigma$ evidence for a radial dependence. Outside the cluster core ($R>0.3\, R_{\rm 200}$), the quenched fraction above $\log {(M/{\rm {M_\odot }})}=9.5$ is $\sim 40{\rm\,\,per\, cent}$, and the quiescent SMF is similar in shape to the star-forming field. In contrast, the cluster core has an elevated quenched fraction ($\sim 70{\rm \,\,per\, cent}$), and a quiescent SMF similar in shape to the quiescent field population. We explore contributions of ‘early mass-quenching’ and mass-independent ‘environmental-quenching’ models in each of these radial regimes. The core is well described primarily by early mass-quenching, which we interpret as accelerated quenching of massive galaxies in protoclusters, possibly through merger-driven feedback mechanisms. The non-core is better described through mass-independent environmental-quenching of the infalling field population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→