MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411136134 · doi:10.1101/2025.06.06.658308

Imaging CRISPR-Edited CAR-T Cell Therapies with Optical and Positron Emission Tomography Reporters

2025· preprint· en· W4411136134 on OpenAlexaff
Rafael E. Sanchez‐Pupo, John J. Kelly, Nourhan Shalaby, Ying Xia, Francisco Manuel Martinez-Santiesteban, Ivy Verriet, Matthew S. Fox, Justin W. Hicks, Jonathan D. Thiessen, John A. Ronald

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsCancerCare ManitobaLawson Health Research InstituteUniversity of ManitobaWestern University
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsPositron emission tomographyCRISPRPhysicsMedical physicsPsychologyNeuroscienceBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have shown remarkable success in treating hematological cancers and are increasingly demonstrating potential for solid tumors. CRISPR-based genome editing offers a promising approach to enhance the potency and safety of CAR-T cells. However, several challenges persist, including inefficient tumor homing and treatment-related toxicities in normal tissues, which continue to hinder widespread adoption. Advanced imaging technologies, including bioluminescence imaging (BLI) and positron emission tomography (PET), provide real-time insights into CAR-T cell distribution and activity in vivo, both in preclinical models and in patients. Here, we developed Trackable Reporter Adaptable CRISPR-Edited CAR (tRACE-CAR) T cells, a modular system for site-specific integration of CARs and imaging reporters. Methods The luciferase reporter AkaLuciferase (AkaLuc) or the human sodium iodide symporter (NIS) were cloned downstream of the CAR in adeno-associated virus (AAV) donors for BLI or PET tracking, respectively. CARs with imaging reporters were knocked into the TRAC locus of primary human T cells via CRISPR editing and AAV transduction. Editing efficiency was evaluated by flow cytometry and junction PCR. In vitro cytotoxicity was assessed by BLI using firefly luciferase (Fluc)-expressing cancer cells co-cultured with CAR-T cells at varying effector-to-target ratios. In vivo, BLI and PET imaging assessed CAR-AkaLuc and CAR-NIS T cell expansion and trafficking in Nod-SCID-gamma mice bearing xenograft tumors. Results T cell receptor (TCR) knockout efficiency exceeded 85%, with CAR expression observed in 70–80% of cells, depending on the reporter used. Reporter-engineered CAR-T cells retained functionality in vitro and exhibited significant cytotoxicity against target cancer cells, outperforming naïve T cells. In vivo, AkaLuc BLI and 18 F-tetrafluoroborate PET enabled non-invasive tracking of viable CAR-T cells. Notably, the route of administration (intravenous, peritumoral, or intraperitoneal) significantly influenced the distribution of CAR-T cells and their therapeutic effectiveness. Conclusion tRACE-CAR enabled precise optical and PET tracking of CAR-T cells in models of B cell leukemia and ovarian cancer, allowing dynamic, non-invasive monitoring of cell distribution in both tumors and off-target tissues. This imaging platform could lead to more personalized, effective CRISPR-edited CAR cell therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicCAR-T cell therapy research→French-language works237,207→