MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Quantifying vessel noise and acoustic habitat loss in marine soundscapes

2025· article· en· W4411136509 on OpenAlexafffundabout
B Hendricks, Matthew K. Pine, Goran Baer, Maureen Welton, Helena Symonds, D. Tom Dakin, Hussein M. Alidina, Chris R. Picard, J Wray

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Pollution Bulletin · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsGovernment of British ColumbiaTRIUMFWorld Wildlife Fund CanadaPositive Living Society of British Columbia
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaSave Our Seas FoundationDonner Canadian Foundation
KeywordsSoundscapeAmbient noise levelNoise (video)Environmental scienceOceanographyAcousticsMarine habitatsHabitatSound (geography)GeologyFisheryEcologyBiologyComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantifying underwater vessel noise in marine ecosystems is challenging, due to difficulties in accounting for small, not publicly tracked boats, creating a knowledge gap in marine management. We present a computationally efficient framework that detects all vessel noise in hydrophone recordings and quantifies associated excess noise levels as well as acoustic habitat loss, offering a cost-effective and replicable tool for assessing vessel noise effects on marine soundscapes. Applied to one year of acoustic data from five sites along the coast of British Columbia (BC), Canada, the detector achieved 96.4 % accuracy and was robust against varying levels of vessel traffic and weather conditions. Across sites, vessel noise impacts increased with proximity to urban centers. Following this trend, average annual vessel noise presence ranged between 24 % and 85 %, increasing the 500 Hz decidecade band by 1.0 dB to 6.4 dB across sites. The average year-round acoustic habitat loss for killer whales, expressed as the reduction of listening space in a 0.5-15 kHz communication band, ranged from 6.6 % to 46.9 %. Vessel noise impacts were generally higher during daylight hours and in the summer months. The results are the first comprehensive, empirical assessment of vessel presence and associated noise impacts for a regional ecosystem in BC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score0.643

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Pollution BulletinSame topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207