SEQSIM: A novel bioinformatics tool for comparisons of promoter regions—a case study of calcium binding protein spermatid associated 1 (CABS1)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding transcriptional regulation requires an in-depth analysis of promoter regions, which house vital cis-regulatory elements such as core promoters, enhancers, and silencers. Despite the significance of these regions, genome-wide characterization remains a challenge due to data complexity and computational constraints. Traditional bioinformatics tools like Clustal Omega face limitations in handling extensive datasets, impeding comprehensive analysis. To bridge this gap, we developed SEQSIM, a sequence comparison tool leveraging an optimized Needleman-Wunsch algorithm for high-speed comparisons. SEQSIM can analyze complete human promoter datasets in under an hour, overcoming prior computational barriers. RESULTS: Applying SEQSIM, we conducted a case study on CABS1, a gene associated with spermatogenesis and stress response but lacking well-defined functions. Our genome-wide promoter analysis revealed 41 distinct homology clusters, with CABS1 residing within a cluster that includes promoters of genes such as VWCE, SPOCK1, and TMX2. These associations suggest potential co-regulatory networks. Additionally, our findings unveiled conserved promoter motifs and long-range regulatory sequences, including LINE-1 transposable element fragments shared by CABS1 and nearby genes, implying evolutionary conservation and regulatory significance. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide insight into potential gene regulation mechanisms, enhancing our understanding of transcriptional control and suggesting new pathways for functional exploration. Future studies incorporating SEQSIM could elucidate co-regulatory networks and chromatin interactions that impact gene expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".