MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411137075 · doi:10.1088/1873-7005/ade285

Flow around surface-mounted low-aspect-ratio rectangular flat plates

2025· article· en· W4411137075 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueFluid Dynamics Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSurface (topology)Flow (mathematics)Aspect ratio (aeronautics)Materials scienceMechanicsGeometryFlat surfaceMathematicsPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The mean flow around surface-mounted low-aspect-ratio rectangular flat plates was studied experimentally for four different aspect (height-to-width) ratios (AR = 1, 0.5, 0.35, 0.2) with the plate oriented normal to flow (at an angle of attack of β = 90°, where the angle of attack represents the rotation of the flat plate about its vertical axis). In addition, the mean wake of the plate of AR = 0.2 was studied at angles of attack from β = 90° to 10°. The Reynolds number was Re = 7.4 × 10 4 based on plate width and the boundary layer thickness relative to the plate width was δ / W = 0.83. At β = 90°, the near wake is dominated by the shear layer separating from the top of the plate and a large recirculation zone behind the plate. The far wake is characterised by one or two pairs of streamwise counter-rotating vortex structures. For AR = 1, downwash reaches the ground plane and there is a single pair of dipole structures. For AR = 0.5, 0.35, and 0.2, downwash does not reach the ground plane and there are two pairs of vortex structures: a stronger outer vortex pair and a weaker inner vortex pair. For the plate of AR = 0.2, as β is lowered from 90° to 10°, the mean wake shifts laterally, the outer and inner vortex pairs become asymmetric, and some vortex merging occurs. From β = 45° to 10°, the mean wake is dominated by a wing-tip (trailing) vortex adjacent to the ground plane, which induces additional streamwise vorticity of opposite sign. The maximum vortex strength and greatest peak vorticity occur from β = 30° to 45°, and the greatest vortex generator effectiveness (defined as the ratio of vortex circulation to aerodynamic drag) was found to occur at β = 30°.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it