MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411137433 · doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2025.132100

Enhanced second harmonic generation in hybrid MoS2/Au/MoS2 and MoS2/SiO2/MoS2 Langmuir-Blodgett films

2025· article· en· W4411137433 on OpenAlexafffund
Cédric Lambin, Wensen Wang, Gilles Pécastaings, Damien Voiry, Serge Ravaine, François Lagugné‐Labarthet

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topic2D Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique
KeywordsLangmuir–Blodgett filmMaterials scienceOpticsHarmonicSecond-harmonic generationLangmuirNanotechnologyPhysicsPhysical chemistryMonolayerChemistryAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transition metal dichalcogenides have gained much attention due to their semiconducting properties, enabling a wealth of applications that integrate these 2D materials. Optical properties such as luminescence and nonlinear optical properties are of particular interest for photonic applications despite the small surface of the individual exfoliated flakes or the inherent difficulty to mechanically transfer flakes grown by CVD onto a given substrate. Herein, we investigate the Langmuir-Blodgett transfer of exfoliated MoS 2 flakes deposited onto glass coverslips. Intercalation of Au and SiO 2 nanoparticles between 2 layers of MoS 2 was conducted using successive LB deposition, enabling the formation of heterostructures films with conductor and dielectric materials. The properties of these films were investigated using Raman spectroscopy and second harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy. The multilayers films are transferred on ∼cm 2 surface area with good coverage but with uncontrolled crystalline orientation of the MoS 2 flakes. Raman enhancement of MoS 2 was evidenced when Au nanoparticles are intercalated between two layers of MoS 2 . Polarized SHG microscopy shows a transition from quadrupolar response of the MoS 2 flake driven by their D 3h symmetry to a dipolar polarized response driven by the Au nanoparticles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.839

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics CommunicationsSame topic2D Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207