Microbial starch degradation in arid soil: Community dynamics, environmental influences, and archaeological implications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Starch is the primary energy storage compound in plants, and the most important carbohydrate in the human diet. Intact starch granules have been found in archaeological contexts, suggesting that starch may be recalcitrant to degradation in certain conditions. We identified microbial communities that degraded tuber starch in arid soils from Oldupai Gorge, Tanzania, and assessed their dependence on moisture, O 2 , and starch purity. Laboratory soil microcosms were amended with ground native Ipomoea longituba tubers or purified starch from Solanum tuberosum (common potato), which both contain starches of B-type crystallinity. Sequencing of 16S rRNA and 18S rRNA genes, DNA-stable isotope probing with 13 C labelled starch, and metagenomic analysis of amylases all indicated that starch was metabolised by diverse bacteria belonging mostly to the phyla Actinomycetota and Bacillota (Firmicutes) , and by Ascomycota fungi. Some of the starch-degrading Actinomycetota were also enriched in the rhizosphere of field Ipomoea longituba plants. Some microbes responded to both substrates, while others responded only to one. Members of the genus Streptomyces were stimulated by potato starch but not Ipomoea longituba tuber material, while members of the genus Bacillus were stimulated by Ipomoea longituba tuber but not potato starch. The use of purified starch in experiments therefore did not fully reproduce the complex interactions between plant-derived starch and soil microbial communities. Although starch purity, soil moisture and pO 2 , and microbial community all affected starch metabolism, visible starch granules were always rapidly destroyed, even when subsequent respiration of the starch material was severely limited. Native Ipomoea longituba starch granules were destroyed within a few days in all treatments. Our results therefore suggest that long-term preservation of native, unmodified starch granules in soils over long time periods is unlikely even under very harsh conditions. These results provide some guidance for designing future studies into starch preservation mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".