Bibliographic record
Abstract
The American historian Martin Klein examines the practice of slavery from the seventeenth century in West Africa’s Saint-Louis-du-Senegal, the Gold and Slave Coasts (Elmina, Whydah, and Lagos), and the Bight of Benin (Niger Delta and Calabar). This commerce also involved Portuguese, English, French, and Dutch slavers. Klein examines the role of powerful African signares: women traders who were married to European men in trading companies. Along with métis (mixed-race) families, these were active slave owners and slave traders in eighteenth-century Senegal. The enslaved in Saint-Louis also worked as sailors, masons, cooks, blacksmiths, laundresses, and traders. From the seventeenth century, an Afro-Dutch community emerged in what is now Ghana, which played important roles in the Dutch trading company-led slave trade in Elmina Castle. These slaves also worked as carpenters, bricklayers, coopers, cooks, and stonebreakers. Whydah had French, English, and Portuguese settlements involved in the slave trade, while slavery in British-dominated Lagos continued into the colonial era. Enslaved labour in Lagos was involved in fishing, crafts, manufacturing, and transport, while the Bight of Benin’s slavery was largely indigenous-led.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".