MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411144546 · doi:10.1016/j.iatssr.2025.05.002

E-scooter riders: A cross-cultural analysis of traffic safety attitudes and behaviors

2025· article· en· W4411144546 on OpenAlexaff
Milad Delavary, Craig Lyon, Ward Vanlaar, Robyn Robertson, Dimitrios Nikolaou, George Yannis

Bibliographic record

VenueIATSS Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsTraffic Injury Research Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransport engineeringHuman factors and ergonomicsPoison controlOccupational safety and healthInjury preventionSuicide preventionEngineeringPsychologyForensic engineeringMedical emergencyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid adoption of electric scooters (e-scooters) has transformed urban mobility, offering a practical and flexible alternative to traditional transportation modes, particularly in areas with limited access to public transit. However, this rise in popularity has also brought about serious road safety concerns, particularly regarding risky behaviors such as riding under the influence of alcohol, carrying multiple passengers, and non-compliance with traffic regulations. While non-compliance with traffic regulations is not unique to e-scooter users, the combination of multiple risky behaviors observed among them may contribute to a higher likelihood of such violations. In addition, protective behaviors, such as helmet use, remain low among many riders, increasing injury risk in the event of a crash. This study aimed to analyze the prevalence of self-reported risky behaviors across various demographic groups and regions, and to assess factors contributing to the likelihood of unsafe e-scooter riding behavior. To achieve this, we used data from the third edition of the E -Survey of Road users' Attitudes (ESRA), focusing on responses from 39 countries worldwide. Descriptive analyses of self-reported data were conducted to examine e-scooter usage patterns and self-declared risky behaviors. Additionally, mixed-effects logistic regression models were employed to identify significant predictors of these behaviors, including gender, age, student status, crash history, and attitudes toward traffic laws. The results revealed that younger individuals and males are more likely to use e-scooters and engage in risky behaviors. Key factors influencing or associated with these behaviors included previous crash involvement, student status, and permissive attitudes toward safety regulations. The study highlights the need for targeted safety interventions that address infrastructural factors as well as behavioral factors, including demographic and attitudinal influences. This integrated approach can help policymakers develop more effective strategies to mitigate the risks associated with e-scooter use and enhance urban road safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.510
Teacher spread0.427 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIATSS ResearchSame topicUrban Transport and AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207