Optimal Policy for Inventory Management with Periodic and Controlled Resets
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Problem definition: Inventory management problems with periodic and controllable resets occur in the context of managing water storage in the developing world and dynamically optimizing endcap promotion duration in retail outlets. In this paper, we consider a set of sequential decision problems in which the decision maker must not only balance holding and shortage costs but discard all inventory before a fixed number of decision epochs with the option for an early inventory reset. Methodology/results: Finding optimal policies for these problems through dynamic programming presents unique challenges because of the nonconvex nature of the resulting value functions. Moreover, this structure cannot be readily analyzed even with extended convexity definitions, such as K-convexity. Managerial implications: Our key contribution is to present sufficient conditions that ensure the optimal policy has an easily interpretable structure, which generalizes the well-known [Formula: see text] policy from the operations management literature. Furthermore, we demonstrate that, under these rather mild conditions, the optimal policy exhibits a four-threshold structure. We then conclude with computational experiments, thereby illustrating the policy structures that can be extracted in various inventory management scenarios. Funding: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [Grant CMMI-1847666] and the Division of Graduate Education [Grant DGE-2125913]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0318 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it