MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Dietary Patterns, Sodium Reduction, and Blood Pressure in Type 2 Diabetes

2025· article· en· W4411150371 on OpenAlexaff
Scott J. Pilla, Hsin Chieh Yeh, Christine Mitchell, Edgar R. Miller, Susan Oh, Karen White, Nowella Durkin, Ariella Apfel, Jeanne Charleston, Mengyang Lu, Xiao Hu, Banggu Wu, Elizabeth Selvin, Michael Fang, Nisa M. Maruthur, Stephen P. Juraschek, Noel T. Mueller, Nae‐Yuh Wang, Lawrence J. Appel, Justin Echouffo Tcheugui, Joseph Sartini, Jennifer Trost, Dan Wang, Scott L. Zeger, Caroline Abbas, Patricia Bayton, Alexandra Bender, Ina Glenn-Smith, Tara M. Harrison, Sharon Jackson, Dawn Jiggetts, Mia Johnson, Alexa Sabie, Chanchai Sapun, Haley Schlechter, Xinyi Shen, Valerie Sneed, Petar Stoykov, Alison Terry, Letitia Thomas, Isabelle J. Wang, Frank M. Sacks, Vivian Fonseca, William M. Vollmer

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Internal Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSodium Intake and Health
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsMedicineBlood pressureDiabetes mellitusType 2 diabetesDashDASH dietPopulationInternal medicineCrossover studyWeight lossEndocrinologyObesityPlaceboEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: People with type 2 diabetes and hypertension are at high risk for blood pressure-related cardiovascular events. Few trials have tested the blood pressure-lowering effects of dietary interventions other than weight loss in this population. Objective: To determine the effects of dietary patterns and sodium reduction on blood pressure in adults with type 2 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension for Diabetes (DASH4D) was a randomized 4-period crossover feeding study conducted at a community-based study center from June 2021 to June 2024. It included adults with type 2 diabetes, a systolic blood pressure of 120 to 159 mm Hg, and a diastolic blood pressure of less than 100 mm Hg. The DASH4D diet is a Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH)-style diet optimized for people with type 2 diabetes (lower carbohydrates, higher unsaturated fats, and lower potassium than the original DASH diet). Participants were provided all of their food and ate no outside food. Weight was held constant. Data analysis was completed in November 2024. Interventions: Participants were randomized to a sequence of 4 diets, each for 5 weeks: (1) DASH4D diet with lower sodium, (2) DASH4D diet with higher sodium, (3) comparison (typical US) diet with lower sodium, and (4) comparison diet with higher sodium (reference). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary and secondary outcomes were end-of-period systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively. The primary dietary contrast compared the DASH4D lower sodium diet vs a comparison higher sodium diet. Results: Of 102 participants, 85 (83.3%) completed all diet periods. The mean (SD) age was 66 (8.8) years, 67 (66%) were women, 6 (6%) were self-reported Asian, 89 (87%) were Black, 2 (2%) were Hispanic, 6 (6%) were White, mean (SD) baseline blood pressure was 135 (9)/75 (9) mm Hg, and 67 (66%) used 2 or more antihypertensive medications. Compared with the comparison diet with higher sodium, the DASH4D diet with lower sodium reduced end-of-period systolic blood pressure by 4.6 mm Hg (95% CI, 7.2-2.0; P < .001) and diastolic blood pressure by 2.3 mm Hg (95% CI, 3.7-0.9). Most blood pressure reduction occurred during the first 3 weeks of each diet, and the effect of sodium reduction appeared stronger than the effect of the DASH4D diet. Adverse events were infrequent in each diet. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that, for adults with type 2 diabetes, most of whom were treated with multiple antihypertensive medications, the DASH4D diet combined with sodium reduction achieved a clinically relevant reduction in blood pressure, primarily from sodium reduction. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04286555.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA Internal MedicineSame topicSodium Intake and HealthFrench-language works237,207