MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411154986 · doi:10.3390/e27060608

Generalized Derangetropy Functionals for Modeling Cyclical Information Flow

2025· article· en· W4411154986 on OpenAlexaff
Masoud Ataei, Xiaogang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueEntropy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInformation theoryStatistical physicsEntropy (arrow of time)Nonlinear systemScalar (mathematics)GaussianApplied mathematicsComputer scienceMathematicsMutual informationStochastic processArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a functional framework for modeling cyclical and feedback-driven information flow using a generalized family of derangetropy operators. In contrast to scalar entropy measures such as Shannon entropy, these operators act directly on probability densities, providing a topographical representation of information across the support of the distribution. The proposed framework captures periodic and self-referential aspects of information evolution through functional transformations governed by nonlinear differential equations. When applied recursively, these operators induce a spectral diffusion process governed by the heat equation, with convergence toward a Gaussian characteristic function. This convergence result establishes an analytical foundation for describing the long-term dynamics of information under cyclic modulation. The framework thus offers new tools for analyzing the temporal evolution of information in systems characterized by periodic structure, stochastic feedback, and delayed interaction, with potential applications in artificial neural networks, communication theory, and non-equilibrium statistical mechanics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEntropySame topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207