Teachers’ Experiential Strategies for Bridging Writing Proficiency Gaps among Secondary Level Students
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The secondary level English curriculum of Nepal aims to enable students to produce various forms of writing items, such as paragraphs, essays, reviews, stories, dialogues, and letters in both personal and academic contexts. However, many students in Nepalese context struggle in the early stages of writing proficiency due to which they are unable to accomplish the competency as targeted by the curriculum. Therefore, this study intends to explore the strategies to bridge the gaps between target of curriculum and proficiency level of students in Nepalese ELT classes by collecting data from secondary level English language teachers through in-depth interview under the framework of hermetic phenomenology and interpreting their lived experiences creating the themes on the basis of broader and specific meaning units. I found that the ecosystem in language teaching created the atmosphere to learn language skills and aspects interactively. Additionally, the theme and genre-based writing activities enabled learners to develop writing skill with proper style and cohesion. This study will be beneficial for those English language teachers who are facing problems of writing proficiency gaps in their students while developing writing skill. With the help of strategies suggested by this study, the teachers can guide students to develop both initially fundamental writing skills and then gradually take them to the level of creative writings to meet the target of curriculum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it