MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411160474 · doi:10.4028/p-0ktlvb

Research on Evaluation Methods for Particle Emission Levels of Retrofit DPF in Engineering Machinery

2025· article· en· W4411160474 on OpenAlex
Juan Liu, Yong Li, Jin Wang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in science and technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle emissions and performance
Canadian institutions123 Certification (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceParticle (ecology)Nuclear engineeringEngineering physicsMechanical engineeringSystems engineeringAerospace engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many local governments currently require diesel-powered engineering machinery to be retrofitted with Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF) to reduce particle emissions. However, some machinery users remove or damage the filter in DPF to reduce maintenance costs, resulting in direct emission of particles into the air in the exhaust gases. This study proposes a method of using portable emission equipment to directly measure exhaust particulate matter to accurately assess whether the DPF is functioning properly. A comparison of the emission characteristics of particulate number concentration under high and low idle conditions was conducted in the study, revealing that measuring PN under high idle conditions can accurately identify whether the DPF in the machinery is functioning normally. At the same time, a comparison was made between the PN test results under high and low idle conditions and the current free acceleration smoke test results. It was found that machinery using electronic control systems cannot use the free acceleration smoke method to identify whether the DPF in the machinery has been damaged.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.411 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it