MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411160739 · doi:10.54254/2753-7064/2024.23640

Emotional Stimulus Sensitivity among Chinese: Is There a Correlation with Dissociative Experiences?

2025· article· en· W4411160739 on OpenAlex
Fanshu Ma

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Humanities Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyDissociativeStimulus (psychology)CorrelationCognitive psychologyClinical psychologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using the Dissociative Experience Scale (DES-II) and the Emotional Sensitivity Scale (ESS), this study examines the association between emotional sensitivity and dissociative experiences in a Chinese population. Most of the dissociation research has concentrated on Western people; however, this study bridges the cultural divide by looking at comparable occurrences in China. The results indicate a strong positive connection between emotional sensitivity and dissociation after adjusting for gender, anxiety, and depression. These results imply that people who are more sensitive to emotions may be more likely to have dissociative experiences, maybe because of having trouble controlling strong feelings. This study emphasizes the necessity for culturally competent therapies and advances our understanding of dissociation in non-Western environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it