Application and Effectiveness of KNN Model in Stock Market Prediction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Predicting the future price of a stock is of great significance to investors, businesses and market analysis. Price forecasting can be used to optimize capital and resource allocation; And the transparency and accuracy of price forecasts can enhance the confidence of market participants. But predicting stock prices is also tricky. As a nonparametric supervised learning method, KNN model has attracted much attention for their simplicity and flexibility in time series forecasting. This paper studies the applications’ effect of KNN model in stock market prediction, Coca-Cola, AT&T and McDonald's were selected for the study. The researcher used R language for data processing, time series decomposition and model validation. The results show that the performance of KNN model in stock price prediction of different companies or industry varies. This study provides empirical support for the application of KNN models in stock market forecasting, especially in the context of company industry diversity, and demonstrates the adaptability of KNN models under different data characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it