MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411162377 · doi:10.5194/essd-2025-277

A Bioavailable Strontium Isoscape of Australia

2025· preprint· en· W4411162377 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony Dosseto, Florian Dux, Clément P. Bataille, Patrice de Caritat

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStrontiumBusinessEnvironmental scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Strontium isotope ratios (⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr) at the Earth’s surface offer powerful tools for geological, environmental, and archaeological applications. In minerals and biological materials, ⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr reflects the isotopic composition of the local bedrock and derived soils. In Australia, however, large regional-scale surveys of bioavailable ⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr remain scarce. Here, we present a new dataset of bioavailable ⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr ratios from 278 catchment outlet (floodplain) sediment samples, spanning inland southeastern Australia (South Australia, New South Wales, Victoria), northern Western Australia, the Northern Territory, Queensland (north of 21.5° S), and the Yilgarn Craton in southern Western Australia. Combined with more than 20,000 global Sr isotope measurements, this dataset was used to generate a high-resolution isoscape of Australia using random forest regression (Bataille et al., 2020). Australian bioavailable ⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr values span a narrower range (0.70501–0.78121) compared to co-located bulk sediment values (0.70480–1.09089) (Caritat et al., 2022, 2023, 2025b), reflecting the influence of soluble and exchangeable mineral phases and atmospheric inputs such as rain and dust. The predicted isoscape reproduces major geological patterns, with higher values over ancient crustal provinces like the Yilgarn Craton and eastern Palaeozoic orogens, and lower values across younger sedimentary basins and coastal margins. Model uncertainty, assessed via prediction standard deviations, is lowest across well-sampled, geologically stable regions and highest in coastal and lithologically complex zones. Compared to existing global and regional isoscapes, our model offers significantly improved coverage and resolution for Australia. This isoscape provides a robust baseline for applications in provenance research, palaeoecology, and environmental geochemistry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207