MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411166675 · doi:10.31542/spfr9q12

Internationalization of Education and the Experiences of International Students: What is Known

2025· article· en· W4411166675 on OpenAlexaffabout
Olabisi Oyelana

Bibliographic record

VenuePedagogical Inquiry and Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Education and Multiculturalism
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternationalizationInternational educationInternationalization of Higher EducationPolitical scienceHigher educationPedagogySociologyMathematics educationPsychologyInternational tradeBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the number of international students crossing borders from the Global South to study in the Global North continues to grow, there is a call for an appropriate response to the needs of this category of Canadian immigrants. Using the theoretical framework of border crossing, in this paper, I examine the historical and contemporary contexts of the internationalization of education and what is known about the experiences of international students. In this paper, I also utilize the ideas of border crossing to examine the links between the experiences of the borderlands by international students and the impacts on their multiple identities. In conclusion, I suggest a radical position instead of a rhetorical approach on issues affecting international students, which includes creating an inclusive environment that embraces openness to differences and fosters the true spirit of equity and diversity. A desirable approach is to build a learning environment that facilitates a sense of belonging for all students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0110.027
Scholarly communication0.0180.014
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.164
GPT teacher head0.534
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePedagogical Inquiry and PracticeSame topicGlobal Education and MulticulturalismFrench-language works237,207