MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411167323 · doi:10.2196/74126

Exploring Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis by Disease Severity: Cross-Sectional Analysis

2025· article· en· W4411167323 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amr Molla, Raed Jannadi, Dareen Hafez, Lujain S Alrohaily, Ebtesam Abdullah, Duha W Azouni, Muayad Albadrani

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Dermatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtopic dermatitisCross-sectional studyPreprintMedicineDermatologyDiseaseInternal medicinePathologyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition affecting a significant percentage of the global population. Emerging research suggests a potential link between AD and neurodevelopmental disorders like attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, there is a lack of comprehensive studies within the Saudi Arabian population examining this association. Objective: This study aims to determine the prevalence of ADHD among patients with AD in Saudi Arabia and to explore potential associations with demographic and clinical factors. Methods: In this cross-sectional, multicenter study conducted between May and November 2024, 419 patients with AD were recruited from various hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Children were screened for ADHD symptoms using the ADHD Rating Scale-5, while adults were assessed with the Adult Self-Report Scale. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the influence of AD severity, age, gender, nationality, and BMI on the likelihood of ADHD symptoms. Results: A total of 419 patients with AD were included, of whom 234 (55.8%) were children and 185 (44.2%) were adults; 239 (57%) were female and 360 (85.9%) were Saudi nationals. ADHD symptoms were identified in 84 (20%) patients, with a slightly higher prevalence among children (49/234, 20.9%) compared to adults (35/185, 18.9%; P=.61). No significant associations were found between ADHD symptoms and gender, nationality, BMI, or AD severity in either age group. Moderate to severe AD was more common among adults (48/185, 25.9%) than children (42/234, 17.9%; P=.048). Conclusions: This study found that 20% of patients with AD screened positive for ADHD symptoms, with slightly higher rates in children than adults. No significant associations were observed between ADHD symptoms and gender, nationality, BMI, or AD severity. Although no significant clinical predictors were identified, the findings emphasize the need for ADHD screening in patients with AD, particularly in regions with high AD prevalence. Future longitudinal studies should explore underlying mechanisms and assess how managing one condition may influence the other.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR DermatologySame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207